Megan Leslie, NDP environment critic, on climate change & Kyoto

A local member received  this email in response to her question about the United Nations Conference on Climate Change. I have reprinted it here as it provides clarity on the NDPs position on climate change.

+++++++++++++

From: <megan.leslie@parl.gc.ca>
Date: December 15, 2011 1:52:21 PM PST
To:
Subject: RE: United Nations Conference on Climate Change - urgent action needed
Anne,

Thank you for sharing your concerns about climate change with me. New Democrats have been very clear in the House of Commons that the government should live up to its commitments under existing climate change agreements, and that they should play a constructive leadership role in the establishment of the next international climate change agreement. 

New Democrats support the following key priorities for the next international climate change protocol:

       a fair, ambitious and binding agreement;

       adequate financing for the Green Climate Fund to assist developing countries with adaptation and mitigation of climate change;

       closing the “gigatonne gap” between the world’s promised emissions cuts and actual action; and

       ensuring that there is no gap in legally binding commitments when Kyoto runs out in 2012.

This Parliament, New Democrats have tabled for the third time the Climate Change Accountability Act, a legislative framework with the firm, science-based emissions reduction targets required for Canada to meet its international obligations. This bill, which was first introduced by Jack Layton and passed by the House of Commons on two occasions, was unjustifiably obstructed by the government and eventually voted down by the unelected Senate.

The government’s decision to withdraw from the Kyoto protocol is irresponsible and misguided. It will further damage Canada’s international reputation and compromise Canada’s voice in future international climate change negotiations. By withdrawing they are letting the big polluters off the hook and attempting to hide six years of total inaction on the environment by avoiding the emission reduction audits that are an important part of the Kyoto protocol. 

The reality is that Conservative’s domestic climate change plan is failing. The latest report from the International Institute for Sustainable Development shows that Canada is on track to achieve only 46% of its own weakened greenhouse gas reduction targets, which have been reduced by 90% since 2007, even when taking into account both federal and provincial reduction initiatives.

Climate change will not respect borders. It is estimated that the effects of climate change will cost Canadians over $5 billion annually by 2020, significantly affecting our health, economic well-being and national security. This is why climate leadership from our government is so important, both domestically and internationally.

It is still possible for Canada to return to a leadership position on climate change, by starting at home and adhering to our climate change commitments, choosing green energy over fossil fuels, and ensuring our communities can cope with a changing climate. We need to support the key priorities for a new climate change protocol, and make significant domestic green energy investments that work jointly with ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets.

A healthy, biologically diverse environment is the greatest gift we can leave future generations, and the global transition to a green economy offers Canada the opportunity to improve both our environment and our economy.

 By making smart investments that support our local economies, we can also establish a green technologies sector that will put Canada at the leading edge of international green trade.

Conservative inaction means that the rest of the world is moving forward in building the new energy economy.  Canada is being left behind, which is going to cost us jobs and trade opportunities.

The time for action is now. New Democrats will continue to pressure the government to improve its environmental record, and to take a leadership role in the fight to combat climate change.

Sincerely,

Megan

 
Megan Leslie 

Member of Parliament for Halifax
NDP Environment Critic
774 Confederation Building, House of Commons
Ottawa, ON  K1A 0A6
Ph: (613) 995-7614 / E-mail: megan.leslie@parl.gc.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/MeganLeslieMP
Website: www.meganleslie.ca

Gateway Lakeview Resort development threatens salmon habitat

Concerns over Proposed Resort Presented to CSRD

By Jim Cooperman and Veronica Bene

On July 20th, the Lee Creek Ratepayer’s Association directors made a presentation to the CSRD that provided concerns regarding the proposed expansion of Gateway Lakeview Resort.

The Gateway expansion proposal has the potential to triple the population of our quiet rural residential community and, if approved, it would profoundly alter the North Shuswap Official Community Plan (OCP). The proposed bylaw currently before the CSRD Board recommends revising the OCP to allow for a Major Destination Resort to be located in Lee Creek. Currently, the OCP only allows these resorts to be located in primary or secondary settlement areas and disallows such resorts in Lee Creek.

The OCP states: “Lee Creek was not designated as a Settlement Area for two reasons: proximity to salmon spawning grounds on the lower reaches of the Adams River and its confluence with Shuswap Lake; and proximity to Scotch Creek.” (Section 10-1) and “Furthermore: “In light of the environmentally sensitive conditions associated with the foreshore of Lee Creek and the mouth of the Adams River, a Major Destination Resort is inappropriate in this area.” (Section 10-5-7)

The Gateway proposal alters these restrictions to accommodate a major destination resort in Lee Creek.

The presentation included a list of current impacts from the existing RV and cabin development; including destabilizing of neighbouring land from site terracing, illegal boat launching, increased risks to salmon nursery from fuel spills and boat activity, and sewage effluent deep lake outfall.

Potential impacts include insufficient beachfront for a resort and dock space for the potential 1000-1800 Gateway residents, increased effluent into the lake, increased fire safety concerns, the effect that the proposed 7,000 sq. foot retail space could have on Scotch Creek businesses that depend on summer residents and visitors, and increased demand for parking at the McKay Bay public swim area. As well, increased foot traffic between the resort and the beach that is across the highway could create a traffic safety problem.

Quaaout Lodge, a beautiful destination resort, has a hotel, golf course and an extensive beach and grounds. Whereas, the Gateway proposal calls for a mix of rental units, stores, RVs, cabins, homes, duplexes, a community centre, a swimming pool, and a small area of beach adjacent to sensitive fish habitat.

The presentation acknowledged how the CSRD directors will be faced with a planning dilemma. They will have to decide between making major changes to a community plan or respecting the vision of the community and protecting the sensitive salmon habitat, which would risk court action.

The bylaw has now passed first and second reading to allow for the public hearing to be held at the end of August. Hopefully, everyone who cares about the future of the North Shuswap will attend.
========================
Jim Cooperman, President,
Shuswap Environmental Action Society
1497 Lee Creek Drive
Lee Creek, B.C., V0E 1M4
250-679-3693, cell 319-4197
jcoop@ribaa.ca, www.seas.ca
www.shuswapwatershed.ca
========================